Comparison
москоугёрлз vs ПАРАДЕЕВИЧ
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @mossgirls | @paradeevich |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 996,251 | 1M |
| Avg views | 79,332 | 83,640 |
| Engagement rate | 8.0% | 8.0% |
| 30-day growth | +11.5% | +11.4% |
| Language | Русский | Русский |
| Category | — | — |
| Channel age | 887 days | 2055 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@mossgirls
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@paradeevich
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.