Comparison
ππΌπππ π―π²π± ππΌπΌπΈ vs rusich_army
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels β audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @lotus365bookid | @rusich_army |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 11,655 | 10,545 |
| Avg views | 8,122 | 83,400 |
| Engagement rate | 69.7% | 790.9% |
| 30-day growth | β | -5.4% |
| Language | English | English |
| Category | β | bots |
| Channel age | 395 days | 7 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics β we have no admin access to Telegramβs native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@lotus365bookid
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@rusich_army
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict β see the methodology.